![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Just popping in quick from work to link to two different blog posts I thought were particularly insightful: first, Tiger Beatdown has a post on curating safe(r) spaces in online comment threads, which among other things, links to this fantastic the origins of Devil's Advocacy, and how it has been twisted.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-04 03:33 pm (UTC)The only point I remain skeptical about is not allowing certain kinds of commenters (such as non-disabled in a disabled discussion) and still expecting to learn from it. I mean, great if it's a space for a certain group, but most people are less interested in discussion they cannot participate in and if it's a space specifically for a group they're not a part of, it's not a space for them. Which is as it should be, because the group needs its own safe space, I just think expecting people who can't participate to still look and learn from the discussion gives most people too much credit.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-04 04:18 pm (UTC)The only point I remain skeptical about is not allowing certain kinds of commenters (such as non-disabled in a disabled discussion) and still expecting to learn from it.
That's definitely the ideal, not the reality. But they do say a lot of things in this one (and the one it refers to about the Foxnewsification of commenting) that I think some people need to hear: re, all comments are not always of value, and asshole mansplainers shouldn't expect their comments to be published, and when they aren't, it isn't violating their free speech.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-05 04:17 am (UTC)The devils advocate one is very good.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-05 10:55 pm (UTC)But yes! Devil's Advocate total got bookmarked and will be sent to people whenever necessary.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 03:08 am (UTC)