Jan. 4th, 2012 08:53 am
mysticalchild_isis: (snow white)
[personal profile] mysticalchild_isis
Just popping in quick from work to link to two different blog posts I thought were particularly insightful: first, Tiger Beatdown has a post on curating safe(r) spaces in online comment threads, which among other things, links to this fantastic the origins of Devil's Advocacy, and how it has been twisted.

Date: 2012-01-04 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
::thumbs up:: Interesting article and yesssss on the Devil's Advocate thing. So often it's used as a way to use increasingly offensive arguments without actually having the balls to position yourself with those views.

The only point I remain skeptical about is not allowing certain kinds of commenters (such as non-disabled in a disabled discussion) and still expecting to learn from it. I mean, great if it's a space for a certain group, but most people are less interested in discussion they cannot participate in and if it's a space specifically for a group they're not a part of, it's not a space for them. Which is as it should be, because the group needs its own safe space, I just think expecting people who can't participate to still look and learn from the discussion gives most people too much credit.

Date: 2012-01-05 04:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Okay so I skimmed the tiger beat down at work... did I read that right? It's okay for a non-Muslim to write an article on and mod the comments of a Muslim issue but god forbid you weigh in on a disabled issue if your not disabled? What did misread?

The devils advocate one is very good.

Date: 2012-01-06 03:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Me too. I worked a normal shift the last two days. How do people go to work at 8? auuug


mysticalchild_isis: (Default)

January 2016

1011 1213141516

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 23rd, 2017 06:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios